A dark game of protest in Manipur

The National, Mar 15 2012

NEW DELHI // Once a year, the “world’s longest hunger striker” gets a day or two of freedom from the hospital room that has been her prison for more than a decade.

Across India’s remote north-eastern state of Manipur yesterday, supporters of Irom Sharmila Chanu, known as the “Iron Lady” for her long-running protest against military violence towards civilians, lit candles to mark her 40th birthday.

But Ms Sharmila was not there to see them. She was already back in custody, 24 hours after being released.

Her crime of “attempting to commit suicide” only allows police to hold her for a year at a time – so an annual ritual has taken place for the past 11 years in which she is released and then quickly re-arrested.

The rules also mean she has to appear before a court every two weeks to renew her judicial custody, a process she has been through more than 500 times since she began her hunger strike in November 2000.

After each hearing, she returns to the 3 metre-by-3.5 metre room in the Jawaharlal Nehru hospital in the state capital, Imphal.

There she spends her time with one guard always by her side and two more in the room next door, a feeding tube lodged permanently in her nose to keep her forcibly fed.

Her room is adorned with a few books, toys and paintings donated by well-wishers from around the world, but access to Ms Sharmila is closely guarded by the state government with very few visitors – even family or her lawyer – allowed.

“A couple of years back, an activist friend came and gave her a candle through the hospital gates on the 10th anniversary of her hunger strike,” said Babloo Loitongbam, a rights activist from Manipur and close confidante of Sharmila.

“A photographer took a picture of this happening and it ended up in the newspaper. Within two days, the guard who had let this happen was transferred out of the hospital.”

At any moment, Ms Sharmila could end her hunger strike and walk free. Her determined refusal to do so has earned her numerous human rights awards and shone a light on one of India’s darkest corners.

Manipuri groups have been demanding independence for as long as India has existed. Neglected by a distant Delhi government, dozens of militant organisations sprouted in the region in a bid to win recognition for their community, and in later years, money and power.

Ms Sharmila’s protest is directed against the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), which has allowed the army to operate among the civilian population in Manipur for more than 53 years.

Activists say the act has created a culture of impunity with the army. Ms Sharmila began her hunger strike in response to the alleged killing of 10 civilians by an Indian paramilitary force – one of many such incidents over the years.

India is preparing for a UN review of its human rights situation in May, and the law, which also applies in parts of Kashmir, is expected to top the list of criticisms.

With a powerful new mandate won in state elections last week, the chief minister, Okram Ibobi, is under little pressure to give ground.

But Ms Sharmila remains defiant.

“There is no place for AFSPA in a civilised society,” she told reporters during her brief release. “I will continue to agitate unless the draconian act is scrapped.”

Advertisements

One response to “A dark game of protest in Manipur

  1. Desmond Coutinho

    She doesn’t have a lawyer. RK Anand a close associate of Babloo Loitongbam whom you quote is described as a human rights lawyer and activist, he replaced her brother as Managing Trustee of Just Peace Foundation in March last year which has diverted all her prize money and has never provided audited accounts, he was elected as an MLA campaigning for the Ibobi Singh regime. Clearly he is under no pressure given that so called activists and Sharmila Supporters campaign for the CM and no change occasionally lighting candles but nothing else practical. The terms of her imprisonment were ruled illegal by the local Chief Judicial Magistrate last year also. He suggested that High Court action would allow more reasonable access and prevent the petty banal behaviour of the Government. Although Mr Loitongbam denies isolating her with the supra vires letter issued by the Chief Secretary at the behest of the DG Imphal Police Prisons a long time associate of Babloo’s Uncle, neither he nor any local Manipuri activist have tried legal action to gain reasonable access to Sharmila. Given that they now filter all requests, they have diverted all her prize money for personal use, and are against any political action for change. Change is unlikely to come from within Manipur. Manipuris have behaved with their usual hypocrisy cowardice and greed. But if the truth upsets you by all means do not let this stand. I am pressing for Sharmila to stand for the national elections in 2014. But as Babloo and his cronies forbid her any real support it may be difficult to arrange meetings. That and Indian lawyers being too frightened to represent us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s